Disagree
First, unless you bend the fuel pipes, there is no need to replace them. If you use the correct tools (there is a split socket for this purpose) to loosen and tighten the fuel line nuts, torque them properly, keep the pipes in the same place (mark them with a felt-tip pen so you know which end is which and keep them in order!) and don't damage them there is no reason to replace them. I've never replaced mine, they do not leak, and I've replaced my entire injector set once (long story - some idiot had the wrong injectors in my engines when I got the boat!) and pulled a couple of "bad actors" another couple of times. I have no fuel dilution in my oil come change time according to the lab and nice oil puddles on top of my fuel line nuts when I pull the valve covers. 'Nuff said.
Someone was yanking your chain (at your significant expense) if they told you that fuel lines had to be replaced whenever disturbed. If I recall correctly those things are roughly $25 each! 32 of 'em is $800 - for nothing. It simply is not true that they need to be replaced unless you ape them, and if you do, then you may well ape the new ones too. Overtorquing the flare-style pipes will crack the flares and then you will get fuel leaks into the oil - bad news. If you have the new style pipes with O-ring seals, then close inspection of the O-rings is called for (any crap on the seal area will cause it to leak) and the O-rings should be changed if questionable, but replacing the pipes themselves as a routine measure is uncalled for and calls into question the mechanic's ability to properly wield his or her tools and not damage things.
Now you know why I don't let so-called "mechanics" on my boat any more, and do my own work. If some jack tried to tell me that I had to spend $600 for new fuel pipes just to change out injectors (all 12 of 'em in my engines) I'd tell them to go stuff their overcharging bill-stuffing head where the sun doesn't shine, and get the he|| off my boat - if they can't turn a wrench without breaking things they sure ain't taking off any of my valve covers!
Second, what were the ACTUAL results of your compression tests? You are aware that there is a tolerance between worst and best cylinder, along with a minimum, right? If you violate the former you not only end up with an unbalanced engine under power (different compression results in different power output in each hole) but you ALSO get light-offs where one or more holes are not firing - and that makes a shizload of smoke, as I noted. If you're below minimums on ANY cylinders you will get smoke like crazy on starts even in reasonably warm weather.
I live in the Florida Panhandle.
In the winter, we get overnight freezes. In the summer, we get temperatures in the 80s overnight
I've owned my Hatt now for close to 4 years. I've seen her behavior on cold starts (with no block heaters) in every set of conditions from freezing cold (literally - going over to run for a while to add heat to the engine room so the fresh water system doesn't freeze overnight!) to blistering (100+ days) hot.
My engines have NEVER caused me that kind of trouble. If the weather is particularly cold, I will pre-heat by holding the STOP switch (or the governor stop lever if I start in the engine room) and cranking for 5 seconds or so - sometimes twice - before attempting a start. I do this for startup smoke control - its not necessary, but it helps. I do not have block heaters, as there's no good place to install them on my engine configuration.
If its taking 10 minutes for your engines to clear up at fast idle after a cold start in weather that you can run around in without a winter parka, then something's not right.
Its not necesasrily a compression problem - improper injection timing can do this, as I noted. But in your case you do know you have a compression problem.
Any colder than that, and the water isn't liquid anymore.
In very cold weather (under 40-50F) I DO use the parallel switch as the higher rotational speed at the starter contributes to a faster and better light-off.
We must qualify "smoke" here too. Light wisps on an engine with a 30 degree F block are not "smoke". Doubling as the mosquito control truck IS smoke. Such is expected in 30 degree weather ON STARTUP, but definitely NOT for the next 10 minutes!
As I said, you have to adjust the criteria based on your location and the temperature of the engine and (less so) surrounding air.
Its all about how cleanly you can get that fuel to ignite.
I have roughly 800 hours SMOH on my engines, and roughly 1800 hours TT since new. I bought the boat with "new" majors (that were half-done - at least the kits were done right) and roughly 1000 hours, and run about 250-300 hours a year. The last year has been much lighter due to the hurricane problems down here this summer. I consume about one gallon of oil per engine in 100 hours running time, and I get the kind
of light-off behavior I've described. Warm oil pressure is roughly 20 psi at idle, 55-60psi at 1500 RPM and above. There is no haze on the horizon behind my boat when I'm 100nm offshore and there is nothing to "color" my view behind me.
When I had the wrong injectors in my engine and the "mechanics" had them set up wrong I had quite a bit of smoke and a good bit of haze behind me. Now, with them set up correctly and with the correct injectors I have just a puff of smoke in reasonably warm conditions, and little (comparatively) even when its cold outside. I do get a nice "bolus" of smoke on a cold start in cold weather and water, but it sure doesn't hang around pumping that out for very long.
Water temps here run from 50 to over 90, but unless your cooling system isn't working right only the upper side of this is a major factor; Detroits have bypass thermostats and if your engines won't warm up correctly in cold water the bypass seals in the thermostat housings are probably shot. They're easily replaced, and should be if they're not working right.
If you are below minimums I bet your cross-hatch is gone and the wear indicator on the compression ring is probably gone too. So long as you don't have any broken rings or other really bad behavior you can keep running the engine - one of the "virtues" is that Detroits will run even if totally screwed up - but that doesn't mean you meet specifications - you don't - your power is probably down and EGTs are likely up.
I don't have a problem with complete engine surveys. They are expensive, but worth it in many if not most cases. The point is that if the engines have problems then why spend the $3,000 on engine surveys unless you know the seller will make an appropriate reduction in the selling price IF the survey comes back with unacceptable results - before you spend the money?
MANY sellers will behave in exactly the wrong way under such circumstances - "there ain't nothing wrong with those motors!" - even though you could double as the Mosquito truck even in reasonably warm weather (50-60F OATs) If I'm buying, I want to know that BEFORE I waste my time on the surveys.
My 30-second "compression test" does not prove compression is bad if the engines fail. If they pass, however, it is damn good evidence that all is well in the compression department, and we can proceed with the rest. On Detroits, if there is no reason to question compression you can do a boroscope and save the compression, saving you $50 a hole or so, yet still detect incipient problems that could cost you big bucks.
My "30 second compression test" a screening tool, not a diagnostic one.